Friday, April 18, 2008
Frigid Jones' Diary
That's what the author calls her autobiography which is scheduled to be published soon in an interview to the Daily Mail. It seems to be a tell-all book by a lady who has little to tell anyone. (George Mikes may have been right when he said that on the continent, people have a sex life but in England, they have hot water bottles.) I'm not sure what to make of it although it stuns me that she claims not to have told her family that she has written the book at all. I can understand not telling an abusive husband about writing a book which speaks of his behaviour but considering that she describes her husband as a good man, I cannot imagine why she hasn't told him or her daughters about the book. I know that if I were in their shoes, I would want to have some time to brace myself for the hullabaloo the book will in all probability cause in their lives.
Link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=510248&in_page_id=1879
Woman with Disability Raped, Denied Liberty
There were no prosecutions because she wasn't considered to be a reliable witness due to her disability.
According to the BBC report, "She was sexually assaulted by five men over the past decade - none of whom have ever been prosecuted, despite the attacks being reported to police. ... Four of these incidents, all of which were reported to the police and the fiscal, involved one man." [2]
The report on the Commission's site says:
"The UN Convention on Rights of People with a Disability places a duty on State Parties to ensure effective access to justice for adults with a learning disability on an equal basis with others. For a number of complex reasons, this did not appear to have happened for Ms A. ...
We are satisfied that Ms A is protected from further risk of assault. However, we do have serous reservations as to the lawfulness of certain aspects of her current care plan. ...
The levels of protection that have been put in place mean that she is barely allowed outside her flat without an escort. We believe that this level of restriction requires an appropriate legal intervention and the safeguards that would accompany it. It was generally acknowledged that Ms A was most at risk from a small number of identified men. The fact that these men were not prosecuted has left Ms A at greater risk. Management of these risks has been through highly restrictive care arrangements. If the people who Ms A claimed (and others believed) had assaulted her had been brought to justice, her safety would be less compromised and these restrictions less necessary. ...
It is difficult to escape the conclusion that different standards were applied to Ms A because she had a learning disability." [3]
Links:
[1] criminalletters.blogspot.com/2008/04/very-bad-news-day.html
[2] news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7349900.stm
[3] mwcscot.org.uk/web/FILES/Publications/Justice_Denied_Summary_FINAL.pdf